Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Maxwell Mckennon vs Keegan Smith Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Mckennon vs Smith analysis and find out who is favored!
Maxwell Mckennon vs Keegan Smith Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Mckennon 1 - 0 Smith
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mckennon has won 48.95% of points on their second serve, while Smith has won 48.57%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mckennon, in recent form, has won 49.02% of their opponent's second serve points, while Smith has won 51.49%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.33% and 32.32% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Mckennon has saved 51.61% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Smith has saved 64.29% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Mckennon has won 59.38% of matches played (W/L 19/ 13), with Smith winning 57.14% (W/L 36/ 27) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Mckennon has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 75% (W/L 3/ 1), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 22/ 22). Smith has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 126/ 70), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 33% (W/L 3/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, Mckennon has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 60% of matches (W/L 15/ 10), where as Smith has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 17/ 17). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Mckennon winning 1 times and Smith being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Mckennon winning 2 and Smith winning 0. The last match between Mckennon and Smith was at the Indian Wells 2 Challenger, 23-01-2024, Q3, Hard with Maxwell Mckennon getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:19:28.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Mckennon and Smith have played a deciding set 0 times, with Mckennon winning 0 times and Smith 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Mckennon winning 0, and Smith 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mckennon has played against opponents with an average rank of 101.59 while Smith has played against players with an average rank of 182.97.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mckennon has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Smith has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Mckennon has converted 40% of breakpoint opportunities, and Smith has converted 38.83% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
584
Rank
339
High
25
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
Form
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
52% (25-23)
Career Total W/L
61% (147-94)
58% (7-5)
YTD W/L
56% (15-12)
$0
Career Prize Money
$4,570
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Maxwell Mckennon vs Keegan Smith For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Mckennon VS Smith
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Maxwell Mckennon | Keegan Smith |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 7 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 8 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:19:28 | 1:19:28 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (39/59) | 65% (36/55) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 77% (30/39) | 64% (23/36) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 55% (11/20) | 47% (9/19) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 75% (3/4) | 17% (1/6) |
| Return Points W% | 42% (23/55) | 31% (18/59) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-3 |
Stats 
Maxwell Mckennon
Player
Keegan Smith
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
1
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Maxwell Mckennon | Keegan Smith |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 58% (7/5) | 56% (15/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 54% (15/13) | 57% (36/27) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (126/115) | 54% (329/278) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 58% (7/5) | 60% (15/10) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.3 | 0.55 |
| Aces Total | 35 | 164 |
| DFs per game | 0.25 | 0.26 |
| DFs Total | 29 | 77 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:26:1 | 1:33:45 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 134 | 211.59 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (421/658) | 70% (1269/1815) |
| 1st Serve W% | 65% (275/421) | 70% (892/1269) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (116/237) | 48% (262/546) |
| BPs Won% Total | 40% (26/65) | 39% (70/179) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (256/648) | 39% (708/1799) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 57% (4/3) | 47% (7/8) |
| Futures W/L | 60% (3/2) | 67% (8/4) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 58% (7/12) | 56% (15/27) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 40% (2/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 75% (3/4) | 33% (3/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (5/5) | 88% (16/14) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (5/0) | 13% (16/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 29% (7/2) | 9% (11/1) |
Maxwell Mckennon Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Maxwell Mckennon
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
40%
(
26 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
70
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maxwell Mckennon
Player
Alexander Chang
71%
(
58 of
82)
1st Serve %
57%
(
47 of
82)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
34 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
82)
83
Total Points Won
81
|
6-3 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Collin Altamirano
Player
Maxwell Mckennon
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve %
59%
(
36 of
61)
6
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Liam Broady
Player
Maxwell Mckennon
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
8
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
88%
(
30 of
34)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thai Kwiatkowski
Player
Maxwell Mckennon
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve %
62%
(
44 of
71)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maxwell Mckennon
Player
Keegan Smith
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
1
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maxwell Mckennon
Player
George Goldhoff
55%
(
39 of
71)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
80)
6
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
11
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
69%
(
22 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
20 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
80)
86
Total Points Won
65
|
6-7(1) 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Maxwell Mckennon
56%
(
39 of
70)
1st Serve %
70%
(
55 of
79)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
79)
84
Total Points Won
65
|
6-2 3-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Keegan Smith Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Moerani Bouzige
Player
Keegan Smith
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve %
74%
(
49 of
66)
7
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
1
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
14 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
23 of
66)
66
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Keegan Smith
Player
Mukund Sasikumar
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve %
67%
(
58 of
86)
13
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
6
82%
(
40 of
49)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
29%
(
20 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
86)
86
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yuta Shimizu
Player
Keegan Smith
58%
(
46 of
79)
1st Serve %
68%
(
41 of
60)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
37%
(
29 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
24 of
60)
74
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Keegan Smith
Player
Axel Nefve
58%
(
80 of
138)
1st Serve %
69%
(
80 of
116)
5
Aces
5
9
Double Faults
8
73%
(
58 of
80)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
60 of
80)
43%
(
25 of
58)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
10 of
36)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
40%
(
55 of
138)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
46 of
116)
129
Total Points Won
125
|
7-5 6-7(8) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Keegan Smith
Player
Andres Urrea
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
43%
(
22 of
51)
5
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
66
Total Points Won
40
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Benjamin Lock
Player
Keegan Smith
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve %
78%
(
64 of
82)
10
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
4
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
38 of
64)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
12 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
79
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Antoine Bellier
Player
Keegan Smith
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
75%
(
33 of
44)
10
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
14 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Keegan Smith
Player
Elmar Ejupovic
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
88%
(
37 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
29%
(
4 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Keegan Smith
Player
Santiago Padilla Cote
80%
(
39 of
49)
1st Serve %
69%
(
34 of
49)
8
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
63
Total Points Won
35
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Keegan Smith
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
1
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
3
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Mckennon Vs Smith Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Mckennon are available here and Smith photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
